Jenny started by talking about women’s necklines in the
early 16th century, and particularly the V in the back of some
illustrations. She examined the wide square front neckline with a V back in Holbein’s
drawing which shows both, and she speculated on how the smock underneath it
may have been made. The construction is problematic because you don’t want the
edge on the bias. She showed (and I haven’t been able to work out which
painting it was) a c1500 crucifixion scene, so it may have been this one
also showing the v back. In another painting, which she said was from a 15th
century triptych in Metropolitan Museum of Art, the V neck back of the green
dress shows her smock with a centre back seam, indicating that perhaps the
edges of the V were on the straight and the seam was on the bias.
Jenny then looked at the extant c.1525 gown of
Maria of Hapsburg, in Budapest. Jenny had a pattern from this, I don’t know
who made it, which shows the smock back and front are each formed from 3
trapezoids, which of course you could top and tail when cutting to minimise
fabric waste. The smock has incredibly fine gathers at neck and is embroidered
over the gathers.
Jenny then looked at two Durer self portraits both showing very
tight pleating. The better known of the two is probably this one, and
here you can see that the top several inches are fine gathers, and at the very
top they are confined by a band of braid. The lesser known one is
very similar at the top, though the fine gathers do not go down as far. Jenny looked at the V&A smock in Cut my
Cote (1) , which has no
shoulder seam, and compared it to one in PoF4 (2) which has a shoulder
seam. She posed the question, is this a smock or square necked shirt?
Jenny then showed a Portrait
of a Young Man by Holbein c. 1520 National Gallery of Art Washington, pointing
out that what we see is not a frill, just top of shirt gathered. Here we have
perhaps the early origins of the neck and wrist ruffs.
Jan van Leiden 1536 by Aldegraver |
Higher necked shirts were contemporary with lower necked shirts
for quite a while. A discussion between Jenny and Jane Bridgeman at the end
narrowed the introduction of the higher necked shirt into Italy to German
influences around 1515. Jenny then showed a high neck shirt in a 1525 painting
by Melzi
showing that the neckline has a side opening.
The Jan
van Leiden portrait of 1536 by H Aldegrever, shows an even higher necked
shirt with a side opening, this time with 3 buttons and loops, and what might be
a separate neckband.
Jenny then looked at the Platt
Hall shirt, that was the subject of an article by Santina Levy (3) , the re-examination
of this shirt had dated it to c.1520, with alterations and the addition of
seventeenth century lace having been made in the nineteenth century. The neckline
of the Platt Hall shirt, is gathered and stitches
worked over to produce a chevron design, this cannot be seen in the Platt Hall
image of the shirt as it is under the later collar.
This type of chevron design appears again in an Aragon family shirt
c1530-50 kept with the Aragon family graves at the Church of San Domenico
Maggiore, Naples. There was some conjecture as to whether this could be Italian
smocking, but because neck is lined you can’t see the stitching on the inside.
Jenny also showed the portrait of a man by Moretto
da Brescia 1526, if you use the zoom provided you will see the work around
the neckline.
Jenny finished by discussing a reconstruction she is working on of
a 1530 illustration, no 102 on page 96, in the Trachtenbuch
of Matthaus Schwarz of Augsburg, the whole of the book is available from
the hyperlink. The shirt has really
sloped shoulders, and the reconstruction has 3 and a half yards of fabric going
into the neck.
1. Burnham, D. Cut my cote. Ontario :
Royal Ontario Museum, 1973.
2. Arnold, J. Patterns
of Fashion 4 : the cut and construction of linen shirts, smocks, neckwear,
headwear and accessories for men and women . London : Macmillan, 2008.
3. Levey, S. The
story of a shirt: a cautionary tale with an unexpected ending. Costume. 2010,
Vol. 44.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.