Hatbands became a fashionable item in the sixteenth century, declining at the end of the seventeenth century as fashions in hats changed. Hat ornaments, items such as buttons and individual jewels that could be pinned or sewn onto a cap, were common in the first part of the sixteenth century, but when caps are replaced by the hat, particularly the stiffer felt or beaver hat with a taller crown, then bands come into their own.
Figure 1: Sir Nicholas Poyntz by Hans Holbein. c.1535. |
Looking at caps in Holbein portraits from the first half of the sixteenth century you can see plain caps, such as that worn by Sir Thomas More in his portrait from around 1527, but many of those among the gentry and nobility have decoration. This decoration could be a single item, as in the portrait of Sir Richard Southwell c.1536, or sometimes the decoration went completely round the cap as in Sir Nicholas Poyntz portrait, the original version of which was painted around 1535. [Figure 1] It maybe that when this level of decoration was reached it was easier, or better, to put all the decoration on a band that could then be removed from one cap and put on another, rather than having to take each item off individually. Caps and bands could be given as gifts. In the list of items given by Queen Elizabeth I in 1574 is “One Cappe of blak taphata having a bande of goldesmythes worke conteyning xxv Hartes and Roses enameled and with thre litle pearles pendaunte to every harte”, the recipient appears to have been a child, Thomas Sidney (1569-1595). (1)
Figure 2: Elizabeth Knollys, Lady Leighton, attrib.George Gower. 1577. Montacute House |
High crowned hats with jewelled hatbands can be seen in many portraits, for example the 1577 portrait of Elizabeth Knollys, [Figure 2]or the portrait of Elizabeth Cornwallis from 1573, both of which show this style of hat worn with a jewelled hatband and feathers. In 1563 Raphael Hammond, Queen Elizabeth’s haberdasher, supplied her majesty with “a hatt bande of damaske gold and [with] a plume of whit and blacke feathers with a toppe of fyne egret fethers in it.” (2 p. 200)
The late Elizabethan and the Jacobean periods are the height of the fashion for jewelled hatbands. James VI and I was painted for his wedding in 1595 wearing a tall black hat with a jewelled hatband, a large jewelled ornament in the shape of an A, he was marrying Anne of Denmark, and a small plume of feathers. [Figure 3] On his accession to the English throne he ordered many hats with bands, including richly embroidered bands, bands of Venice gold and silver and a band of velvet, for a cap of black velvet, which was to “set Juelles in.” (2 p. 200) His son Prince Henry also had highly jewelled hatbands, and prior to his death in 1612 had ordered a, “riche hatband all of dyamants with a great Jewell toe it in forme of a Rose.” (3 p. 177) In Prince Henry’s 1608 wardrobe accounts are bills for “embroidering an hatband with several sorts of pearle, having set among the pearle rubies, emerods, and opals; having also three score great pearls £26,” and for a cheaper “band embroidered with pearl £4.” Pearle, sometime spelt purl, in this sense, is a thread for metalwork embroidery, where a silk core has a fine gold or silver wire or strip wound round it. The thread is then couched onto the background fabric.
Figure 3: James VI & I. 1595. National Galleries of Scotland. |
These jewelled hatbands were not confined to royalty. In 1619 Lady Dorothy Thornhurst had stolen from her in London, “two hatbandes with gold buttons set and wrought with Berills and Rubies worth ten pounds.” (4) Richard, 3rd Earl of Dorset, colour co-ordinated his outfits and had his hatbands match his suits. His 1617 wardrobe account shows that his tawney-coloured suit had a “hatband of tawney sattin embroad with gold and crimson silke and laced with gold lace with a rose of tawney sattin and gold lace,” while a black and silver suit had a “hatband embroadered with gold and silver upon black taffeta made up with gold and silver lace” (5)
The less ostentatious hatbands belonging to royalty could be just gold and silver lace, or embroidered with gold and silver purl. In the year 1633 King Charles I ordered 25 gold and silver hatbands, and three that were just black. (6 p. 82) The portrait by Edward Bower of Charles I at his trial shows him wearing a black hat with a very plain black hatband. These were considerably less expensive than those with jewels, in the Middlesex Sessions accounts are the values for ten gold or gold and silver hatbands stolen between 1610 and 1628, they range in value from one shilling (described as old) to one pound. (4) The Howard accounts in 1623 list “for a bever hat for Mrs Marie with a gould band 54s.” (7 p. 206) Hats were usually ordered with bands, rather than the bands being ordered separately. In 1631 the haberdasher Benjamin Frewin delivered, “to Mr, William Weld, ye 9th of January 1631 : It. for a fine black bever lynd head, and for a gould band 2 it £3 4s 0d , It. for a fine colerd felt, lynd, and a thick gould and silver band 16s 0d.” The difference in value of these two items is mainly down to beaver hats being considerably more expensive than felt hats. (8)
Less valuable than gold and silver were silk hatbands, when in 1631 Frewen delivers just “a black silke band 2 the bever” value is just two shillings. (8) In 1610 Luke Shirburn leaves in his will “my best hatt, which is faced with velvet and hath a round silke band.” (9 p. 177) Cypress, sometimes spelt sipers, was a poplar thin silk for hatbands. In 1612 John Willoughby paid “for 1 yard & half of silk syps for a hat band 3s 6d.” In 1618 Ann Large, servant to a shoemaker, had “an old hatt, and a Sipers band 2s,” her entire estate was only worth £3 15s 9d. (10 p. 29) A cypress band might possibly look like that worn by Alice Walton, her 1620s tomb effigy, in St Nicholas Gloucester, shows her wearing a twisted fabric band on her hat.[Figure 4] In 1629 a plumber, Richard Saunders, left, “one old silke and silver hat band and one old small twist silke and silver hatt band. 2s 6d.” (10 p. 71) James Master esquire has several hatbands in his set of accounts, in 1647 and 1648 he pays “for an hat with a black silk hatband 17s” and for a band on its own 2 shillings. (11 p. 171 & 176)
Figure 4: Alice Walton d.1629. St Nicholas Church, Gloucester |
While most bands were bought with the hat they could be purchased separately from haberdashers and other merchants, especially for the lower classes. In 1612 the haberdasher Humphrey Ellis had in stock “4 dosen of Chayn bands for hattes of Cruell 5s,” these work out at a penny farthing each. (10 p. 14) Chayn bands may indicate a warp faced, worsted band, the word chayne is sometimes used to indicate the warp and cruell (crewel) is a worsted yarn. In 1639 Stockport the merchant John Bolande had over £8 worth of hatbands in stock, not including “twenty dozen of course hatt bandes £1,” hatbands that were valued at only a penny each. (12 pp. 220-3) These bands could be wide or narrow. The lady wearing a broad brimmed hat in Hollar’s Ornatus has a narrow band, a detail can be seen in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Detail from Lady in Broad Brimmed Hat by Wenceslaus Hollar. Ornatus. 1640 |
In the second half of the seventeenth century hatbands continued, but they were falling out of fashion and fewer appear in the records. There was company of hatband makers formed by letters patent from Charles I in 1638, but this appears to have been an endeavour to stop the decline in trade, and the patent was revoked the following year. (13 p. 163) In 1670 the hatter John Cope had “A small parcell of Hattbands 8s 0d.” (14 p. 46) Once the hat begins to be cocked on more than one side the hatband disappears from view, and many of the references from the end of the century relate to the provision of hatbands for funerals.
The use of black to indicate mourning meant that it was very common for hatbands. In 1660 Samuel Pepys travelled home “by the way buying a hat band and other things for my mourning to-morrow,” this was to wear to his office the following day, to indicate mourning for the death of Henry, Duke of Gloucester. (15 p. 18th September) The 1678 funeral costs for Bristol merchant George Goswell lists “for hatbands and scarfes £1 19s,” these were given to attendees at the funeral. (14 p. 92) When Edmund Verney was at Trinity College Oxford his brother died, and his father wrote saying, “I have a new black beaver hatt for you wch I will send you next Thursday in a little deal box, with a black crape hat-band.” (16 p. 243) In 1692 11s 6d was spent on “hattbands and scarffs” for the funeral of Thomas Blundy, an innholder. (17 p. 246) In 1709 Timothy Burrell spent for “black crape, hatbands, gloves, 6s” for his sister’s funeral. (18 p. 157)
By the end of the seventeenth century, beginning of the eighteenth century hats were more commonly decorated with feathers, or cockades, or the edge of the brim was decorated, as these were more visible than the hatband. A survival from the 1690s in the Museum of London shows this style of decoration, with gold lace on what would have been the underside of the brim in un-cocked styles, and feathers between the crown and the cock.[Figure 6]
Figure 6: 1690s cocked hat. Museum of London. Object 53.101/6 |
References
1. Arnold, Janet. "Lost from Her Majesty's Back": Items of Clothing and Jewels Lost of Given Away by Queen Elizabeth I Between 1561 and 1585. London : The Costume Society, 1980.
2. —. Queen Elizabeth's Wardrobe Unlock'd. Leeds : Maney, 1988.
3. Awais-Dean, Natasha. Bejewelled: the male body and adornment in Early Modern England. London : PhD thesis Queen Mary College, University of London, 2012.
4. Middlesex Sessions Rolls. Middlesex County Records: Volume 2, 1603-25. Originally published London: Middlesex County Record Society, 1887. [Online] [Cited: August 18, 2024.] https://www.british-history.ac.uk/middx-county-records/vol2/pp142-150.
5. MacTaggart, Peter and MacTaggart, Ann. The Rich Wearing Apparel of Richard, 3rd Earl of Dorset. Costume. 1980, Vol. 14.
6. Strong, Roy. Charles I's clothes for the years 1633-1635. Costume. 1980, Vol. 14, pp. 73-89.
7. Ornsby, G. ed. Selections from the Household Books of the Lord William Howard of Naworth Castle. Publications of the Surtees Society. 1878, Vol. 68.
8. Cooper, William Durant. Extracts from Account-Books of the Everden and Frewen Families in the Seventeenth Century. Sussex Archaeological Collections. 1851, Vol. 4, pp. 24-30.
9. Earwaker, J.P. Lancashire and Cheshire wills and inventories 1572-1696. Manchester : Chetham Society, 1893.
10. George, E. and S. eds. Bristol probate inventories, Part 1: 1542-1650. Bristol Records Society publication. 2002, Vol. 54.
11. Robertson, S. The expense Book of James Master 1646-1676 [Part 1, 1646-1655], transcribed by Mrs Dallison. Archaeologia Cantiana. 1883, Vol. 15, 152-216, pp. 152-216.
12. Phillips, C. B. and Smith, J H. Stockport Probate Records 1620-1650. Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire. 1992, Vol. 131.
13. Beck, S. William. The Draper's Dictionary. London : The Warehousemen & Draper's Journal Office, 1882.
14. George, E. and George, S. Bristol probate inventories, Part 2: 1657-1689. Bristol : Bristol Records Society publication 57, 2005.
15. Pepys, Samuel. Diary. [Online] https://www.pepysdiary.com/diary.
16. Cunnington, Phillis and Lucas, Catherine. Costume for births, marriages and deaths. London : Black, 1972.
17. Mortimer, I., ed. Berkshire probate accounts 1583-1712. Berkshire Record Series. 1999, Vol. 4.
18. Blencowe, Robert Willis ed. Extracts from the Journal and Account Book of Timothy Burrell, … 1683 to 1714. Sussex Archaeological Collections. 1850, Vol. 3.