Woollen yarn dyed with woad. |
What are kersies
Kersey is a twill woven wool fabric. Kerridge (1985) describes them in his book as “warp back cloths woven in twill order,” it is more complex than that, and I would go to Kerridge for a technical description if you are interested.
Kersey comes in several types, the 1552 Act divides them
into ordinary, sorting, Devonshire (called dozens), and check
kersies. Despite the name, Kersey is a town in Suffolk, kersies were made in
various places. The Devonshire dozens were one type, and another statue refers
to kersies made in York and Lancashire, but a large number were also made
around Newbury in Berkshire by, among other people, John Winchcombe
(c1487-1557) who was the Jack of Newbury of Thomas Deloney’s work. (1912) David Peacock’s PhD
thesis on the Winchcombe family is available via Ethos. (Peacock, 2003)
One (standard) broadcloth was reckoned to be equal
to three kerseys, this is less a matter of quality than of size. Throughout the
fifteenth and sixteenth centuries both broadcloth and kersey were regulated by
a series of Statutes. The Statute of 1465 set broadcloth as 2 yards wide and 24
yards long, while kersey was a yard and a nail (a nail is one sixteenth of a
yard -2¼ inches) by 18 yards. However by the beginning of the seventeenth century some kerseys had shrunk to
1 yard by 16 yards, so three kerseys were 48 square yards of cloth, the same
size as one broadcloth. That is for a standard broadcloth, long broadcloths
were 28 to 31 yards in length. (Oldland, 2014)
How common is kersey
It is difficult to ascertain how common kersies were. They
first appear in the mid 13th century, and by the 18th
century Defoe wrote of Yorkshire kersey that one dealer traded for “£60,000 a
year in kerseys only, to Holland and Hamburg.” (Defoe, 1748) In export terms in
the first half of the sixteenth century, before the effects of the start of the
Eighty Years’ War and the expansion of the new draperies, broadcloth and kersey
appear to have formed 90% to 95% of cloth exports, with kersey being between
20% and 30% of this. (Hentschell, 2008)
Having said that they are produced in such amounts, they
don’t appear very often in probate inventories, but as Margaret Spufford (1984) said of probate
inventories, they conceal “quicksands of very considerable magnitude.” It may
be that people compiling the inventories could not tell the difference between
broadcloth and kersey once the fabric had been cut up and made into garments,
but beyond that garments are rarely mentioned in inventories. An analysis of
some Oxfordshire inventories, which are fairly typical, shows that 85% either
don’t mention clothes at all or just say wearing apparel without specifying. Of
the 15% that do list clothes, only one third mention a fabric.
References to kersies in common literature often refer to
kersey being used for hose, and hose is a very movable term in the sixteenth
century. In the OED we have from 1543–4, “For iij quarters of yallow carssey
for hose”, from 1596, “Blacke karsie stockings” and from 1607, “The Stockings
that his clownish Legges did fit, Were Kersie to the calfe, and t'other knit.”
It was William Harrison (1577) in his famous
Description of England who declared of the Englishman that “ Neither was it
merriere with England than when he was knowne abroad by his own clothes, and
contented himself at home with his fine carsie hosen.”
The colours of kersey
This section is based mostly on an article by David Peacock (2006) which examined
Gresham’s Day Book for 1546-1552, this listed goods ordered for export to
Antwerp. Kersies produced by Thomas Dolman of Newbury shows that the bulk of
the cloths ordered between 1547 and 1550 were blue (20.6%), watchet, a light
blue (46.8%) and azure 17.6%, so that in total 85% were in shades of blue. The picture above is one I have had for at least six years, but unfortunately I have no idea where it came from, it shows the range of blues that can be gained by dying with woad. The
other 15% of colours include 13% red and 2% green. Thomas Dolman’s 1575 will shows him
owing “one other howse in Cheapstreate...beinge a Dyhowse and also six
oadefattes (woad vats) two flotefattes, one furnace of copper and another of brass.”
The only producer in the Day Book going beyond these colours is William
Bennett, who between 1548 and 1550 produced 1,647 kersies for Gresham, however
the breakdown is very similar, 35% watchet, 24% blue, 3.6% plunked (a sort of
grey-blue), and 2.4% azure. Beyond the blues we have 7% red, 3% green, and a
tiny amount (3 kersies) in violet.
If we compare this colour range with that obtained from
analysis of English wills, we get a very different grouping. This may well be
because these are cloths for export, because they are specifically kersey, and
because this does not include the large numbers of cloths which weren’t dyed
and are described as sheep colour or white. There is also the problem of black,
natural or dyed, which appears to be one of the most popular colours listed in
wills. Research on Essex wills reveals the main colours to be black, white,
blue or red, with blue being mentioned mainly for men’s coats, breeches and stockings,
while red appears to have been used mainly for women’s petticoats. (Mikhaila
and Malcolm-Davies, 2006) Peachey (2014) makes the same
association of red with women’s petticoats and blue with men’s coats.
References
Defoe, D., 1748. A Tour Through the Whole Island of
Great Britain. 4th ed. London: Birt.
Deloney, T., 1912. The
works of Thomas Deloney; edited by Francis Oscar Mann.. [Online]
Available at: http://archive.org/stream/workseditedfrome00delouoft/workseditedfrome00delouoft_djvu.txt
Available at: http://archive.org/stream/workseditedfrome00delouoft/workseditedfrome00delouoft_djvu.txt
Harrison, W., 1577. Description
of England. s.l.:s.n.
Hentschell, R., 2008. Culture
of Cloth in Early Modern England: Textual Constructions of a National Identity.
London: Ashgate.
Kerridge, E., 1985. Textile
manufactures in early modern England. Manchester: Manchester University
Press..
Mikhaila, N. and
Malcolm-Davies, J., 2006. The Tudor tailor. London: Batsford.
Oldland, J., 2014. Wool
and cloth production in late medieval and early Tudor England. Economic
History Review, 67 (1), pp. 25-47.
Peachey, S., 2014. Clothes
of the common people in Elizabethan and early Stuart England. Bristol:
Stuart Press.
Peacock, D., 2003. The
Wincombe family and the woollen industry in sixteenth century Newbury. PhD
thesis. [Online]
Available at: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402908
[Accessed 12 Dec 2014].
Available at: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402908
[Accessed 12 Dec 2014].
Peacock, D., 2006.
Dyeing Winchcombe kersies and other kersey cloth in sixteenth century Newbury.
Textile History, 37(2), pp. 187-202.
Spufford, M., 1984. The
great reclothing of rural England: petty chapmen and their wares in the
seventeenth century. London: Hambledon Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.