Marie-Louise de Tassis by Van Dyck |
This started when someone posted a detail of a SebastianVrancx painting onto the English Civil War (ECW) and Mid-17th Century Living History Group page on Facebook, the detail is in the bottom right of the painting. While others were discussing the fact that she’s wear a partlet under her gown I was looking at two other features. First since she is taking off the gown, the painting is entitled travellers attacked by robbers, you can see that it is a bodice with a skirt attached, an over gown. Second that she has “virago sleeves,” and as the museum date the painting to 1617-19 these are early.
The over gown.
1620s and 1630s outfits from Kelly and Schwabe |
Over gowns with separate skirts attached to them rarely
survive from this period, the only adult one I can think of is the 1639 gown
worn by Pfalzgrafin Dorothea Maria von Sulzbach. (Arnold, 1985) The loose gowns
examined by Janet Arnold cover the period 1570 to 1620, but they are one piece
from shoulder to ground, and the next examples are the manutas from the late
1690s, early 1700s, again one piece from shoulder to ground. (Arnold, 1977) There was a
surviving over gown of the 1620s in France before the Second World War which
appeared in Kelly & Schwabe’s (1929) book Historic
Costume 1490-1790, shown left. I have no idea where this garment is now, it was originally
in the collection of the Société de l’Histoire du Costume, Paris. This is the
sort of over gown which appears in the Vrancx painting and here in the
Van Dyck portrait of Portrait of Marie-Louise de Tassis. In the Van Dyck
portrait, like the example in Kelly & Schwabe, the virago sleeves are on
the under bodice, and the over gown has a simple sleeve open at the front and
caught together only at the cuff. Whereas in the Vrancx painting the virago
sleeves appear to be on the gown. The pattern in Kelly and Schwabe is described
as after Leloir, Leloir’s Histoire du costume, tome VIII, Louis XII (1610-1643)
was not published until 1933, but the authors acknowledge his help in their
introduction. The pattern gives only the under bodice and the bodice of the
over gown with no pattern for the skirt, nor any information as to how it was
attached, and is shown below.
Pattens from Kelly and Schwabe |
Emily Gordenker (2001) has commented that
Van Dyck, in his later years, removed the over gown from the ladies he painted
in order to simplify the garments worn, so that he could paint the costume more
rapidly. However the gown does appear to be going out of fashion by the middle
of the century, though at least one of Hollar’s Ornatus prints seems to show this
style.
The sleeves.
According to several sources Randle Holme in his Academie of
Armory, 1688, described virago sleeves as ‘The heavily puffed and slashed
sleeve of a woman’s gown, then fashionable.’ I haven’t actually been able to
find this quote. Comments I can find in Holme are that sleeves have “As much
variety of fashion as days in the year,” and “The slasht-sleeve, is when the
sleeve from shoulder to the sleeve hands are cut in long slices or fillets; and
are tied together at the elbow with ribbons, or such like.” When looking at a series of dated women’s
portraits the earliest I have previously found was 1620 and the latest 1632,
giving a fashionable period of some ten years. There is some slashing at the
top of Queen
Anne’s 1617 sleeve in the painting by Somers, but it is not a virago
sleeve. In most of the portraits the virago sleeve is on the garment worn under
the gown and not, as in the Vrancx painting, on the gown itself.
Hollar. Plate from Ornatus |
Bibliography
Arnold, J., 1977. Patterns of Fashion 1: 1660-1860.
London: Macmillan.
Arnold, J.,
1985. Patterns of Fashion: the cut and construction of clothes for men and
women c. 1560-1620.. London: Macmillan.
Gordenker, E.,
2001. Anthony Van Dyck and the representation of dress in seventeenth
century portraiture. Turnhout: Brepols.
Kelly, F. M. and
Schwabe. R., 1929. Historic costume. 2nd ed. London: Batsford.
Some
paintings with virago sleeves.
Princess
Magdalena Sybilla, unknown artist c.1630
Queen Henrietta
Maria by Mytens 1630
Queen
Henrietta Maria by Anthony Van Dyck
Grace
Bradbourne (d.1627), Wife of Sir Thomas Holte attributed to Cornelis Janssens van Ceulen
Charlotte
Butkens, Lady von Anoy, with her son. Anthony Van Dyke C. 1631
Abigail
Sacheverell, Mrs Humphrey Pakington by Cornelis Janssens van Ceulen 1630
Katheryn
Spiller, Lady Reynell attributed to Cornelis Janssens van Ceulen 1631
Elizabeth
Wriothesley, née Vernon, Countess of Southampton, unknown artist, c.1620
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.